Fact-check Your Information

Fact-Check Your Information (FYI): A Design Probe to Understand How People Actually Fact-Check Data-Driven Articles

A browser window with a news article on the left and the FYI side panel filling the rest. In the article, the sentence claiming Drama has the highest average IMDb rating is highlighted, with a Mark as claim button beside it and a Detect claims with AI button below. In the panel, AutoCheck returns MISLEADING at moderate confidence and sets the claimed Drama is number 1 against the actual Thriller at 6.9, above a bar chart of average rating by genre in which Drama is the shortest of the five bars. Below it an AI Chat exchange repeats the correction, a Table Explorer lists movie titles with gross, budget, year and rating, and a Chart Builder is configured with Genre on X and average IMDb rating on Y. On the right a verdict form has Misleading selected, confidence 6 of 7, severity 5 of 7, and a rewritten version of the claim naming Thriller instead of Drama.
Figure 1. The interface of FYI, a browser extension that enables in-situ data claim fact-check­ing directly alongside the article under review. The unified side panel supports a com­plete mixed-initiative pipe­line: (A) Detec­tion via (A1) AI detection or (A2) manual identi­fication; (B) Veri­fication through four com­ple­mentary modal­ities: (B1) Auto Check, (B2) AI Chat, (B3) Table Explorer, and (B4) Chart Builder; and (C) Deter­mination via (C1) user-authored verdicts and (C2) cor­rections and expla­nations.

Abstract

Data-driven journalism and policy reports frequently rely on statements grounded in statistical evidence, referred to as data claims. Verifying such a claim requires connecting it to the underlying structured dataset. However, existing systems typically isolate automated fact-checking from manual data exploration, leaving it unclear how readers coordinate AI assistance with manual inspection of the evidence in practice.

We present FYI, a browser extension that embeds fact-checking in the reading environment, and use it as a design probe to study how people detect, verify, and determine the validity of data claims against the underlying dataset. FYI provides four complementary tools spanning the spectrum from full automation to manual data exploration. In an exploratory study (N=22), participants used FYI to fact-check claims in a data-driven article.

We find that participants adopted three distinct workflow archetypes (AI-first with manual confirmation, manual-first with AI supplement, and parallel co-review), with visualization serving as the primary mechanism for auditing AI conclusions. Trust in AI shifted dynamically, growing when multiple tools converged and eroding when AI outputs were inconsistent.

These findings suggest that fact-checking systems should treat AI as a starting point that human verification complements rather than a definitive authority, elevate visualization as a core verification capability, and support flexible, user-driven workflows. We release FYI as open-source software for further research at github.com/DataVisards/FYI.

Resources

Paper

To appear at IEEE VIS 2026

Pre-print

GitHub

Web application

Browser extension

To be available on the Chrome Web Store